Page 3 of 3

Re: Drugs

Posted: 21 Aug 2012, 10:51
by PicassoCT
Johannes wrote:Yeah, when it comes to chronic use I don't really know which would be the worst.

Of course taking everything together is harsher than sticking to one substance, though.
So there is only one sollution to find out: Make a table of all possible combinations, in all possible doses, and try them..

Re: Drugs

Posted: 21 Aug 2012, 16:54
by Azhukar
PicassoCT wrote:So there is only one sollution to find out: Make a table of all possible combinations, in all possible doses, and try them..
In all possible application methods. :regret:

Re: Drugs

Posted: 21 Aug 2012, 19:11
by PicassoCT
That is going into that.. braint transplant of a heroin dead direction.. i dont like that.. no, oral anal, intravenal.. that should do..

Re: Drugs

Posted: 27 Aug 2012, 00:50
by Panda
PicassoCT wrote:That is going into that.. braint transplant of a heroin dead direction.. i dont like that.. no, oral anal, intravenal.. that should do..
Ew, no people should not stick it in the pooper.

Re: Drugs

Posted: 27 Aug 2012, 01:07
by Azhukar
Panda wrote:Ew, no people should not stick it in the pooper.
Double negative or implied anal propaganda? D:

Re: Drugs

Posted: 27 Aug 2012, 01:22
by smoth
selective interpretation of double negative from party who looks to see such things.

Re: Drugs

Posted: 27 Aug 2012, 01:26
by Azhukar
smoth wrote:selective interpretation of double negative from party who looks to see such things.
Double interpretation? D:

Re: Drugs

Posted: 27 Aug 2012, 13:42
by hoijui
Azhukar's interpretation of the text was correct. Panda probably forgot a comma after the "no".

Re: Drugs

Posted: 28 Aug 2012, 13:40
by varikonniemi
smoth wrote:
Johannes wrote:How would it be very different from current alcohol business?
you act like alcohol is on the same level as cocaine or heroine..
Because it is. Actually, it might be worst of them all.

"Alcohol is more harmful than heroin or crack when the overall dangers to the individual and society are considered, according to a study in the Lancet."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11660210

Which i totally agree with.

Re: Drugs

Posted: 28 Aug 2012, 19:28
by Panda
hoijui wrote:Azhukar's interpretation of the text was correct. Panda probably forgot a comma after the "no".

Yep, I forgot to put the comma after the no.

Re: Drugs

Posted: 28 Aug 2012, 19:30
by smoth
varikonniemi wrote:
smoth wrote:
Johannes wrote:How would it be very different from current alcohol business?
you act like alcohol is on the same level as cocaine or heroine..
Because it is. Actually, it might be worst of them all.

"Alcohol is more harmful than heroin or crack when the overall dangers to the individual and society are considered, according to a study in the Lancet."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11660210

Which i totally agree with.
I value the individual over society

Re: Drugs

Posted: 28 Aug 2012, 19:36
by Azhukar
smoth wrote:I value the individual over society
What does that even mean?

Society is made out of individuals.
You value the individual over society.

You value the individual over the group of individuals?

Re: Drugs

Posted: 28 Aug 2012, 20:19
by smoth
some people are easily worth 1000s of others to the world. Society is largely composed of people who live a waste of a life but this discussion doesn't matter, having people entertain you with pointless discussion which leads to nothing is your M.O., so with that, good day.

Re: Drugs

Posted: 28 Aug 2012, 21:43
by Azhukar
smoth wrote:some people are easily worth 1000s of others to the world
Issues. You has them.

Re: Drugs

Posted: 28 Aug 2012, 21:55
by Rumpelstiltskin
Azhukar.
When you make broad, vague statements and then are asked to clarify your opinion you have all the right in the world to lash out and act like you are superior, while putting down someone else.

It is similar to the "you wouldn't understand anyway" and probably falls under the category of "you are not worthy of my presence".

Re: Drugs

Posted: 28 Aug 2012, 22:15
by Azhukar
Rumpelstiltskin wrote:Azhukar.
When you make broad, vague statements and then are asked to clarify your opinion you have all the right in the world to lash out and act like you are superior, while putting down someone else.

It is similar to the "you wouldn't understand anyway" and probably falls under the category of "you are not worthy of my presence".
My bad. I deeply apolo- bahahahha nope.

"those dirty plebs" claims are always hilarious to read. :D

Re: Drugs

Posted: 29 Aug 2012, 02:19
by Johannes
smoth wrote:
varikonniemi wrote:
smoth wrote: you act like alcohol is on the same level as cocaine or heroine..
Because it is. Actually, it might be worst of them all.

"Alcohol is more harmful than heroin or crack when the overall dangers to the individual and society are considered, according to a study in the Lancet."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11660210

Which i totally agree with.
I value the individual over society
But not the freedom of individuals to use drugs that don't harm other individuals?

Re: Drugs

Posted: 29 Aug 2012, 03:18
by Das Bruce
No man is an island. Though a lot of you are peninsulas.