Moderator: Moderators
Stop trolling. You know the widget is there. http://springrts.com/phpbb/viewtopic.ph ... 82#p371982TradeMark wrote:why dont we make spring rendering 2 pieces at same time like in that image and then we could play it in real 3d while eyes crossed?
Parallel
I'm really tired of you bashing stuff you know nothing about. I will set the record straight each and every time you do.TradeMark wrote:Stop trolling. You know thats not the same effect.
hunterw wrote:
jK put that word unfinished there because he was making some modifications. It does work right now though. But this comes back to talking about something that you've never tried. I just can't take a screenie of parallel mode at this time because I'm not on my comp so I used an existing screenie that has anaglyph as the current selection. The option is there to use all sorts of 3d modes, entirely unlike Caydr's fail video which doesn't even utilize Youtube's own Stereo 3D functionality to let the user see your video any way they want!! I could be viewing his vid on my 3D monitor using yt3d-interleave right now if he had done it right.hunterw wrote:trademark is merely saying that side by side crosseye stereo images aren't the same as the anaglyphic method (red and blue glasses)
since ur thing says parallel (unfinished) i assume its not yet working
problem is what do you do about the minimap? also, you can only see half the width of what you'd normally see
Minimap doesn't matter, no one should be playing using crosseyed mode unless they want to damage their eyes. And yes, half the width. That's the reality of the fact you're showing an image twice on one screen, you only get half the screen for each copy!problem is what do you do about the minimap? also, you can only see half the width of what you'd normally see
I'm really tired of you bashing stuff you know nothing about; its meant to be TWO IMAGES, not one with fancy red channel offset. nobCarRepairer wrote:I'm really tired of you bashing stuff you know nothing about. I will set the record straight each and every time you do.TradeMark wrote:Stop trolling. You know thats not the same effect.
I'm going to laugh so hard when CarRepairer get's home and posts the screenshot because ONE of you is going to be so incredibly and obviously wrong that you will die of embarrassment.TradeMark wrote:I'm really tired of you bashing stuff you know nothing about; its meant to be TWO IMAGES, not one with fancy red channel offset. nobCarRepairer wrote:I'm really tired of you bashing stuff you know nothing about. I will set the record straight each and every time you do.TradeMark wrote:Stop trolling. You know thats not the same effect.
Awh man... now you've ruined it... even if he's right I don't get to laugh at you now because you've hedged yourself... Nothing personal and I have tonnes of respect for you but... I hate you SOOO MUCH TradeMark, I hope you die in fire.TradeMark wrote:yeah i hope he finally learns to post screenshots... thats what im trying to teach him.
I rendered the movie about 10 times with different eye perspective distances and found the one that people around me had the least difficulty seeing in 3D without losing the effect. I can very easily make the effect much stronger, but I think having the effect be easy to see and get used to quickly is a better option for most people.hunterw wrote:staring at an animated stereoimage for hours on end is probably a great way to get migraine headaches
neways sorry caydr ur stereoimage doesnt have much 3dness. compare to something like this
which looks very very obviously 3d
Next time use the yt3d:enable=true tag please.Caydr wrote:At some point I'll probably make another video with more objects in the scene (more ships flying alongside, fighters flying past, a planet in the background or something, etc), but for now a demonstration is all you get.
still you have yet not proved your point to be correct by screenshots, so you fail. once again.CarRepairer wrote:I just hope Trademark decides to play crosseyed mode and his eyes pop out in the middle of a battle and his commander gets napped and he can't do anything about it because his eyes are popped out.
Agreed, so long as both your eyes remain firmly in their sockets, I consider it a failure on my part.TradeMark wrote:still you have yet not proved your point to be correct by screenshots, so you fail. once again.CarRepairer wrote:I just hope Trademark decides to play crosseyed mode and his eyes pop out in the middle of a battle and his commander gets napped and he can't do anything about it because his eyes are popped out.
