Heroes of might and magic - Page 2

Heroes of might and magic

Post just about everything that isn't directly related to Spring here!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by TradeMark »

Gota wrote:I'm not sure about 4 but in 3 everyone takes his turn while all the other players wait.
This is boring and very very long....
It could be less boring if we could switch to windowed mode, i tried some windowed mode forcing applications, but they didnt work very well (mouse was fucked up and sometimes the screen went crazy), so if you could find one application that works for HOMM3 then we're just fine.
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by Gota »

anyway after inspecting heroes 5 with both expansions and patches i have come to the conclusion that its the most online suitable version.
I got both the original and the 2 expansions.
If anyone wants to know how i got them or wants to play with,join #sins tavern (channel) and ask about heroes of might and magic.
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by TradeMark »

Are you aware most people here wants to play HOMM3? >_>
Google_Frog
Moderator
Posts: 2464
Joined: 12 Oct 2007, 09:24

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by Google_Frog »

3333333333333333333!!!!!!

(though tbh I doubt any HOMM will work well online.)
anyway after inspecting heroes 5 with both expansions and patches i have come to the conclusion that its the most online suitable version.
What makes it particularly suitable? Simultaneous turns? Simultaneous turns can't solve everything as battles take a while. It might also turn into a clickfest if you want to raid with a hero and someone else is trying to engage you.
User avatar
1v0ry_k1ng
Posts: 4656
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:24

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by 1v0ry_k1ng »

2 was better, in every way except graphics, 3 takes dicks
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by Gota »

TradeMark wrote:Are you aware most people here wants to play HOMM3? >_>
Yes but are you prepared to play 12 hour games?i can assure u saving and playing on the next day is a very low probability chain of events...
If game is not played in a single game it probably wont finish ever.
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by TradeMark »

1v0ry_k1ng wrote:2 was better, in every way except graphics, 3 takes dicks
why? o_O you enjoy 320x240 resolution?
Gota wrote:
TradeMark wrote:Are you aware most people here wants to play HOMM3? >_>
Yes but are you prepared to play 12 hour games?i can assure u saving and playing on the next day is a very low probability chain of events...
If game is not played in a single game it probably wont finish ever.
well, we could play team games, 2v2 ? should end faster.
Google_Frog
Moderator
Posts: 2464
Joined: 12 Oct 2007, 09:24

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by Google_Frog »

1v0ry_k1ng wrote:2 was better, in every way except graphics, 3 takes dicks
I prefer 2 though 3 is good too and it seems to be the consensus here.

With either game I don't like the idea of spending even a few hours purely playing. It would need to be windowable so downtime during other's turns can be used for something else if turns are taking too long.
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by Gota »

TradeMark wrote:
1v0ry_k1ng wrote:2 was better, in every way except graphics, 3 takes dicks
why? o_O you enjoy 320x240 resolution?
Gota wrote:
TradeMark wrote:Are you aware most people here wants to play HOMM3? >_>
Yes but are you prepared to play 12 hour games?i can assure u saving and playing on the next day is a very low probability chain of events...
If game is not played in a single game it probably wont finish ever.
well, we could play team games, 2v2 ? should end faster.
Yes point is in both cases team games will be faster.
I spent the most time playing Heroes 3 of all the franchise(not sure why anyone would think 2 is better) but i don't think its viable as a multiplayer game.
User avatar
Wombat
Posts: 3379
Joined: 15 Dec 2008, 15:53

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by Wombat »

3 is obviously best, but i have to agree that playing it multiplayer is suicide v_V (tho, i didnt play it since ages, so maybe ppl made some good tiny maps)
User avatar
Teutooni
Posts: 717
Joined: 01 Dec 2007, 17:21

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by Teutooni »

Has no-one really played 5? Simultaneous turns don't solve anything. It turns to normal mode as soon as 2 players' LOS cross. Helpful at start but doesn't really speed up games at all in the long run.

Hotseat is the way HoMM should be played! :wink:
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by Gota »

But you cant play hotseat one versus the other :)
@los comment
Even if its just in the beginning...in some cases it takes a while until you leave your own territory so its good(and definitely better than nothing).
I guess one could make small and very compact maps though,if one wished).
I'll examine some of 5's smallest maps and see.
3 Ill try and get that and see.
(also 5 creatures are definitely much more impressive...)
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
1v0ry_k1ng
Posts: 4656
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:24

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by 1v0ry_k1ng »

Gota wrote:But you cant play hotseat one versus the other :)
@los comment
Even if its just in the beginning...in some cases it takes a while until you leave your own territory so its good(and definitely better than nothing).
I guess one could make small and very compact maps though,if one wished).
I'll examine some of 5's smallest maps and see.
3 Ill try and get that and see.
(also 5 creatures are definitely much more impressive...)
Image
Image
UMAD

Image
Image
Image

FUCK YEAH!!!
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by TradeMark »

I dont like 3d creatures look... and who the fuck plays the game from such angles anyways? they probably look same as BA units from top-down view: piece of crap, as all 3d models do.
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by Gota »

Image
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by TradeMark »

Eh yeah... just like i expected... really boring looking. makes me think of diablo2 and WoW, we just have to wait another decade until the 3d graphics can be as good as 2d graphics 20 yers ago.

also i dont like the idea i have to move invidual units around the map to collect crap for me
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by Gota »

thats heroes 4.heroes 5 is exactly like heroes 3.
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by TradeMark »

Oh? I have heroes 5 but it was like i could control individual units... >_> I'll try it again

Edit: OK i tried it again now, seems like i was wrong... heroes 4 seemed to suck so hard i have deleted it from computer so i mixed those two D:

However, i dont like heroes 5, everything looks the same, i can mix rocks with the enemies etc... cant distinguish stuff from the terrain = annoying to play.
Last edited by TradeMark on 29 Jun 2010, 17:41, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Otherside
Posts: 2296
Joined: 21 Feb 2006, 14:09

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by Otherside »

what makes homm2 better than 3 ?.

It dusnt exactly have more depth or anything.

3 is better in all areas

visually
gameplay
depth.

Especially with mods..
User avatar
1v0ry_k1ng
Posts: 4656
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:24

Re: Heroes of might and magic

Post by 1v0ry_k1ng »

Otherside wrote:what makes homm2 better than 3 ?.

It dusnt exactly have more depth or anything.

3 is better in all areas

visually
gameplay
depth.

Especially with mods..
it dosnt need more depth- homm2 gameplay is perfection. The balance is excellent, the art style and music nostalgic and appealing and the gameplay streamlined. homm3 was OK, but game balance was uninteresting and the art style unappealing and completely without charm. ive got heroes from kings bounty and heroes I all the way upto IV, and II is still easily the best. if you have not played II thats cool, but dont go making claims that its inferior cus umad son
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Discussion”