40d is rock solid stable, latest version is with few not that serious bugs but with caverns + more FUN stuff.
DF succession \o/
Moderator: Moderators
DF succession \o/
Post here who's interested + ideas which version.
40d is rock solid stable, latest version is with few not that serious bugs but with caverns + more FUN stuff.

40d is rock solid stable, latest version is with few not that serious bugs but with caverns + more FUN stuff.
Re: DF succession \o/
Dwarf FortressWombat wrote:what is DF
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
Re: DF succession \o/
Liquid awesome.Wombat wrote:what is DF
Re: DF succession \o/
ASCII boredom.Wombat wrote:what is DF
Re: DF succession \o/
i'm in, as long as you can tolerate a really, really bad DF player
Re: DF succession \o/
Even if you're a total beginner it should be easy to run a fortress for a game year, just remember magmafall in dining room == bad.KaiserJ wrote:i'm in, as long as you can tolerate a really, really bad DF player
Re: DF succession \o/
Chuck me down for it, not so much in support of new version due to fuck crazy military system and bugs.
Re: DF succession \o/
if anything, i'll be good for some lols
i remember my last fortress, there were cats and dogs everywhere for some reason shitting in the halls, and i didnt have enough dwarves to clean up after them, and most died of miasma
also goblins ALWAYS kidnap my babies
i remember my last fortress, there were cats and dogs everywhere for some reason shitting in the halls, and i didnt have enough dwarves to clean up after them, and most died of miasma
also goblins ALWAYS kidnap my babies
Re: DF succession \o/
I won't commit to it now, but I'm interested. I'd play either 40d with Civ. Forge or a less buggy future build of the present version with Civ. Forge or equivalent.
Re: DF succession \o/
Das Bruce wrote:ASCII boredom.Wombat wrote:what is DF
