Problems with det.

NOiZE · Post by **NOiZE** » 04 Mar 2007, 11:19

AF wrote:loosing your commander shouldnt mean you loose the game, as you may very well be in the superior position even after you loose your commander, and may go on to win the game.

In the long run its funner to play the game rather than a hunt down a single unit.

Not really, with continous you are losing an intresting concept of the game.

Ishach · Post by **Ishach** » 04 Mar 2007, 11:29

Volatility is more fun than safety

I liked some of the crazy stuff in AA2.2* (with the exception of weasels) cause one unexpected unit could change the game with its super power.

AF · Post by AF » 04 Mar 2007, 11:45

The odd thing was that the weasels where just as overpowered in 2.1* and 2.0 and 1.5

Lolsquad_Steven · Post by **Lolsquad_Steven** » 04 Mar 2007, 11:50

Yeah someone started telling everyone, so it had to be nerfed.

tombom · Post by **tombom** » 04 Mar 2007, 11:51

AF wrote:The odd thing was that the weasels where just as overpowered in 2.1* and 2.0 and 1.5

They were decent but the changes that made them horribly ovepowered were in 2.22:

Weasel HP increased 50%, weapon damage increased 25%, maximum speed reduced 10%, turnrate reduced 100

and 2.11:

Jeffy, Weasel damage boosted to 50 (30)

.

1v0ry_k1ng · Post by **1v0ry_k1ng** » 04 Mar 2007, 12:40

so basicly what happened is this;
in dets game you organised the mother of all combombings. det didnt like this and now he dosnt want to play with you, and he also mutes you from his clan channel.

hunterw · Post by **hunterw** » 04 Mar 2007, 13:36

tombom wrote: Maybe because he's decided he doesn't like you much? I dunno, it shouldn't really matter what he decides to do in his own private games.

Tim-the-maniac · Post by **Tim-the-maniac** » 04 Mar 2007, 15:35

I think the bigger issue is det not locking his games when he hosts. He makes me look like a fool trying to talk to people who are in-game

(for anyone who doesnt know det is on linux and so his status is never in-game)
Also, combombing or whatever you did can be very fun but dont complain if you then get kicked from their game

manored · Post by **manored** » 04 Mar 2007, 16:21

I think Det haves the right not to play with you if he wants so. You can say its discrimination, but its still his game and he still can chose. Now, he surely doesnt haves the right to kick you from the spring's looby for this.

The problem of combombing/naping is that its a tactic that done correcly ensures victory, and since the main objective is win, you cant blame someone who does so even if it ruins the fun of the game. The right thing to do would be changes in the mod.

I only ever got comnaped 2 times: In the first i was noob enough to not know the possibily of connaping... In the second i was connaped by my ally and lost because it was com ends... I BLAME YOU CABBAGE!

DemO · Post by **DemO** » 04 Mar 2007, 17:08

flop shouldnt be banned from springie just because det doesnt like him.

det can ban him from his OWN games as he wishes, no questions asked.
det can mute him in #lcc if he wants.

det shouldn't be banning flop from an autohost howerver, because of a comm bomb....

LordMatt · Post by **LordMatt** » 04 Mar 2007, 17:25

The autohost called Springie is an LCC autohost, so det can ban you from it as long as licho, its owner, doesn't disagree. How about you leave det alone for a while?

ZellSF · Post by **ZellSF** » 04 Mar 2007, 17:46

flop wrote:Det, a lobby moderator, has been insulting me and kicking me from his games, and when I have tried to contact him about it, he ignores me. He banned me from the springy server after I beat him on an altored game. He refuses to communicate me about the issue via PM. I really dont think this is mod like behavior.

In the altored game I organised to comm drop our commanders into the enemies base. It worked brilliantly, det ragequit, and we won the game. Afterwards, det did this:

"[3:03:52 AM] * Springie [Fluffy]flopflop ([Fluffy]flopflop) is banned for Ruining games"

He still refuses to communicate with me via PM, so I am forced to use the forums to attempt to get my message across.

He banned you from his game and his clan's autohost, it's a matter to take up with him or his clan not random people on an internet forum.

There's no one here who has reason to do anything against det for the horrible crime of not wanting to play with you.

flop · Post by **flop** » 04 Mar 2007, 19:33

ZellSF wrote:
flop wrote:Det, a lobby moderator, has been insulting me and kicking me from his games, and when I have tried to contact him about it, he ignores me. He banned me from the springy server after I beat him on an altored game. He refuses to communicate me about the issue via PM. I really dont think this is mod like behavior.

In the altored game I organised to comm drop our commanders into the enemies base. It worked brilliantly, det ragequit, and we won the game. Afterwards, det did this:

"[3:03:52 AM] * Springie [Fluffy]flopflop ([Fluffy]flopflop) is banned for Ruining games"

He still refuses to communicate with me via PM, so I am forced to use the forums to attempt to get my message across.
He banned you from his game and his clan's autohost, it's a matter to take up with him or his clan not random people on an internet forum.

There's no one here who has reason to do anything against det for the horrible crime of not wanting to play with you.

Well since hes a moderator and wont discuss the issue posting it on the forums is a completely acceptable option. If he didnt like how I played he could not join game that I'm in. It doent mean he should kick/ban me from everything possible that isnt #main, simply because he didnt like how I played. He could have at least told me not to do that again in games with him first. I have replays of him doing the EXACT same thing too.

LordMatt · Post by **LordMatt** » 04 Mar 2007, 20:20

Lion wanted to post but he was having trouble registering. He said that you kept joining a private LCC game and harrasing det and lion. Frankly, as long as det does not use his moderator powers in private disputes, he can prevent you from annoying him any way he chooses. If he doesn't want you in his games, the clan autohost, or the clan channel, he can ban you from those things, as long as the other clan members don't disagree and I have a feeling that LCC will support det over you. Making a big show of it on the forum just shows your lack of maturity, probably why he doesn't like you in the first place.

flop · Post by **flop** » 04 Mar 2007, 20:41

LordMatt wrote:Lion wanted to post but he was having trouble registering. He said that you kept joining a private LCC game and harrasing det and lion. Frankly, as long as det does not use his moderator powers in private disputes, he can prevent you from annoying him any way he chooses. If he doesn't want you in his games, the clan autohost, or the clan channel, he can ban you from those things, as long as the other clan members don't disagree and I have a feeling that LCC will support det over you. Making a big show of it on the forum just shows your lack of maturity, probably why he doesn't like you in the first place.

I never harrased anyone. How was I harrassing? All I did was join the game, ring det, and ask him why he kicked me, as he woudnt reply via PM. I was replyed with a smart remark from lion and a kick from det. If you think me trying to communicate with a lobby moderator about an issue is harrassment, your greatly mistaken. The only reason I posted this on the forum is because I he wont talk to me about it like an adult. Licho said that after he heard det's side he would probably unban me from springy. If you think that posting about an issue that I have tried to resolve in other ways on the forum to attempt to bring dets attention to the matter is in any way more immature than ragebanning and kicking from unrelated things then your completely blind.

LordMatt · Post by **LordMatt** » 04 Mar 2007, 20:46

PMing someone when you know they don't want to talk to you and joining their games is harrassment. "Adults" let issues go and don't keep bothering people who don't want to be bothered, nor do they make big scenes.

flop · Post by **flop** » 04 Mar 2007, 20:48

LordMatt wrote:PMing someone when you know they don't want to talk to you and joining their games is harrassment. "Adults" let issues go and don't keep bothering people who don't want to be bothered, nor do they make big scenes.

He never said he didnt want to talk to me. He just replied with kicks and rash decisions. I am attempting to bring his attention to this. I have logs of det calling me a faggot and replays of him doing the exact same strat he banned me for on altored. Thats real mature right?

iamacup · Post by **iamacup** » 04 Mar 2007, 20:58

i have logs of me calling you a faggot from way before det was born.

LordMatt · Post by **LordMatt** » 04 Mar 2007, 21:03

iamacup wrote:i have logs of me calling you a faggot from way before det was born.

Cup I have logs of u calling me everything under the sun. IMMEDIATE BANSTIX 4 CUP.

manored · Post by **manored** » 04 Mar 2007, 21:25

LordMatt wrote:
iamacup wrote:i have logs of me calling you a faggot from way before det was born.
Cup I have logs of u calling me everything under the sun. IMMEDIATE BANSTIX 4 CUP.

But if in space there is no gravith, how can you tell wich way is down?

No problem with det ignoring flop and kicking him from his games, but if he is kicking him from clan channels/games winhout being the clan leader or from autohosts winhout the autorization of its onyer he should be stoped.

Spring RTS Engine

Problems with det.

Re: Problems with det.

Re: Problems with det.