maps that people play

duncs · Post by **duncs** » 23 Dec 2006, 16:47

Hi

I have been away for about 1.5 months. I only started playing again last night.

so. I like playing fun maps, but it's hard (as a host) to get people to join anything other than altored_divide and speedmetal. what nice new maps are there? suggestions please.

the only new one I've seen is tangerine. it looks pretty cool.

Machiosabre · Post by **Machiosabre** » 23 Dec 2006, 16:54

it's all small supreme and tangerine lately, which is fine if you like that all resources in your base thing, we need a re release of riverdale and maybe another painted desert to get some old fashioned battles back in.

Cabbage · Post by **Cabbage** » 23 Dec 2006, 17:25

flooded desert!

Hellspawn · Post by **Hellspawn** » 23 Dec 2006, 17:29

Comet Catcher Redux ^^

LordMatt · Post by **LordMatt** » 23 Dec 2006, 18:23

Arctic planes, Greenhaven Remake, Painted Desert, Lowland Crossing, if you want to step outside the overplayed maps.

Zydox · Post by **Zydox** » 23 Dec 2006, 18:35

Victoria Crater is also a good map

Day · Post by **Day** » 23 Dec 2006, 19:00

nobody likes Brazilian_Battlefieldv2 ;.;

Machiosabre · Post by **Machiosabre** » 23 Dec 2006, 19:37

Day wrote:nobody likes Brazilian_Battlefieldv2 ;.;

This is the 1st I've heard of it

how is it different from regular Brazilian?

NOiZE · Post by **NOiZE** » 23 Dec 2006, 19:39

Brazilian_Battlefieldv2 = regular Brazilian

Neddie · Post by **Neddie** » 23 Dec 2006, 22:36

Darkside Remake, High v Low, Absolute Zero, Splintered Tropics and Delta Siege all hit high on my list.

Strategia · Post by **Strategia** » 24 Dec 2006, 14:46

Iunno..... I like to test mods on 4B_facility (which is one of my favourites - yes, it is a metal map, but the topography (is that the word?) of the terrain is just so..... fantastic), but apart from that, I just basically play whichever maps are currently being played. (I can't host, so I have to.) Pity, really, since I got about 3.5gigs of maps tucked away, and I only use a few of them.

genblood · Post by **genblood** » 24 Dec 2006, 14:55

There are alot of new and old maps that deserve a second ,,, look ..

All of people like Speedmetal .. why ... must likely you can build
fast and nuke or build level 3 mechs in 15 minutes ...

Most other maps ... would take alot more time ... due to average
metal output and average energy ...

I figure in the coming weeks ... if a good AI comes out ... maybe
the other maps might get a second try ... only my opinion ...

Licho · Post by **Licho** » 24 Dec 2006, 15:41

These are autohosts map stats:

Code: Select all

[15:39:50] <[LCC]Licho> !stats maps
[15:39:50] <Springie> == Globally most popular maps ==
[15:39:50] <Springie> 1. Small Supreme Battlefield.smf (38 games, for total 1 days 2 hours 17 minutes - average game took 41 minutes and had 8 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 2. Altored_Divide.smf (35 games, for total 22 hours 46 minutes - average game took 39 minutes and had 9 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 3. Tangerine.smf (21 games, for total 14 hours 43 minutes - average game took 42 minutes and had 7 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 4. SpeedMetal.smf (18 games, for total 10 hours 45 minutes - average game took 35 minutes and had 4 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 5. Green_Fields.smf (7 games, for total 6 hours 10 minutes - average game took 52 minutes and had 6 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 6. Crossing_4_final.smf (10 games, for total 5 hours 8 minutes - average game took 30 minutes and had 8 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 7. Comet Catcher Redux.smf (9 games, for total 3 hours 48 minutes - average game took 25 minutes and had 7 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 8. DeltaSiegeDry.smf (6 games, for total 3 hours 42 minutes - average game took 37 minutes and had 11 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 9. SpeedMetalDuo v2.smf (5 games, for total 3 hours 29 minutes - average game took 41 minutes and had 7 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 10. SmallDivide.smf (11 games, for total 3 hours 18 minutes - average game took 18 minutes and had 3 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 11. TheColdPlace.smf (5 games, for total 3 hours 10 minutes - average game took 38 minutes and had 4 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 12. Parched_mesa-v04.smf (4 games, for total 2 hours 51 minutes - average game took 42 minutes and had 9 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 13. XantheTerra_v3.smf (6 games, for total 2 hours 28 minutes - average game took 24 minutes and had 5 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 14. Hells Pass.smf (3 games, for total 2 hours 19 minutes - average game took 46 minutes and had 10 players)
[15:39:50] <Springie> 15. NanoArenaV4.smf (9 games, for total 2 hours 17 minutes - average game took 15 minutes and had 2 players)
[15:39:51] <Springie> 16. Brazillian_Battlefield.smf (3 games, for total 1 hours 52 minutes - average game took 37 minutes and had 4 players)
[15:39:51] <Springie> 17. Courtyard-v01.smf (2 games, for total 1 hours 33 minutes - average game took 46 minutes and had 5 players)
[15:39:51] <Springie> 18. Greenhaven Remake.smf (1 games, for total 1 hours 26 minutes - average game took 1 hours 26 minutes and had 2 players)
[15:39:51] <Springie> 19. IslandDivide.smf (2 games, for total 1 hours 21 minutes - average game took 40 minutes and had 3 players)
[15:39:51] <Springie> 20. DeltaSiege.smf (1 games, for total 40 minutes - average game took 40 minutes and had 8 players)

duncs · Post by **duncs** » 27 Dec 2006, 00:54

Licho wrote:These are autohosts map stats:

interesting. thanks
C:

Ishach · Post by **Ishach** » 27 Dec 2006, 04:12

those stats are really different to what i'd thought they'd be outside the top 5

Neddie · Post by **Neddie** » 27 Dec 2006, 04:18

Frankly, they're better than what I expected. they aren't encouraging, but they haven't completely killed all feeling of diversity in maps.

hrmph · Post by **hrmph** » 27 Dec 2006, 05:29

Those stats aren't a very good representation since springie does not have a large number of maps. Theres a page somewhere that shows all the maps it has: it is missing a lot of good ones.

Neddie · Post by **Neddie** » 27 Dec 2006, 05:32

It's talking about all the Springie servers, if I recall, and they have on average over two hundred maps. But no, they don't have all the good ones.

tombom · Post by **tombom** » 27 Dec 2006, 10:44

hrmph wrote:Those stats aren't a very good representation since springie does not have a large number of maps. Theres a page somewhere that shows all the maps it has: it is missing a lot of good ones.

!dlmap <map name>

hrmph · Post by **hrmph** » 27 Dec 2006, 23:17

Ah, my mistake. I thought the stats were for the one springie server only and the only maps it had were listed here: http://www.unknown-files.net/stats/

Spring RTS Engine

maps that people play

maps that people play